Seven major barriers to expanding electrification include challenges around: (1) the pace of transition, (2) technology advancement, (3) infrastructure siting, (4) equipment cost, (5) supply chains, (6) human capital/jobs, and (7) public support. Broad recommendations across studies include: (1) decarbonizing electricity (2) electrifying end uses (3) lowering energy demand and (4) increasing transmission, distribution, and energy storage infrastructure. Finally, the report examines the barriers that could hinder both increased electrification and decarbonization of the pivotal power sector.īy examining and comparing the studies and scenarios within them, the authors were able to identify shared themes resulting in robust insights that can be useful in informing policy makers and guiding other decision-making processes. Second, it examines the relative roles of variable generation resources (e.g., wind and solar), energy storage (both short- and long-duration), and firm low-carbon power (e.g., natural gas with carbon capture, nuclear, hydro, and geothermal) in the energy transition to meet increasing levels of clean electricity demand. First, the report explores the degrees of electrification in the United States that might be needed to achieve net-zero pathways as well as where and how electrification could occur under model assumptions. The authors’ purpose in analyzing the studies was threefold. This work serves to compare their assumptions and results. Six of the studies focus on strategies and pathways to a net-zero energy system and two assess the value of electrification and expanded transmission networks. This report, part of the Power Sector and Renewables Research Initiative and Energy Systems Modeling Analytics program at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, in conjunction with IdeaSmiths, examines eight recent major US studies on the topic. A more detailed assessment of the problem might discover a better path forward. These nuanced dynamics are not easily articulated in public forums regarding the goal to electrify everything. While reducing emissions is paramount in mitigating the negative impacts of the energy system to the environment and human health, it is also critical that changes to energy infrastructure are both socially and politically acceptable, as well as affordable to help ensure an economically vibrant future. ![]() However, there are important questions that remain unanswered about the electrify everything movement, including the technical, social, and political feasibility of the approach, as well as the affordability and equitability of implementation. Rallying cries to “electrify everything” have captured the focus of many headlines and policy forums in recent years. There is a strong and growing consensus that a simultaneously growing and decarbonizing electricity sector is necessary to meet declining greenhouse gas emissions targets. CGEP’s Visionary Annual CircleĬhildren’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF) See below a list of members that are currently in CGEP’s Visionary Annual Circle. Rare cases of sponsored projects are clearly indicated.įor a full list of financial supporters of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University SIPA, please visit our website at. Contributions to SIPA for the benefit of CGEP are general use gifts, which gives the Center discretion in how it allocates these funds. The piece may be subject to further revision. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Center on Global Energy Policy. ![]() This report represents the research and views of the author.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |